From the Pastor - 18th Sunday in Ordinary Time

Often, we live our lives striving for temporary happiness. But today, Jesus reminds us to “not work for food that perishes, but for the food that endures for eternal life.” 

Our Eucharistic meal is the Spiritual Food that we consume — Jesus Himself, Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. It will satisfy us as Jesus says, “I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me will never hunger, and whoever believes in me will never thirst.”
 
We all have the need to be satisfied. It is in our humanity. And in that incompleteness, we grab at what surrounds us to satisfy our hearts. It could be the next job promotion, the comforts in our homes, the next trip we plan to take. The list goes on. We might think to ourselves, ‘then I will be happier.’ Or maybe we don’t even realize how we are relying on those things or events in our lives.
 
And while many of those things are good and bring us joy, they are only a small glimpse of the deeper, lasting happiness that the Lord offers us. They are gifts that should remind us of our Good and Gracious Creator. Instead of placing undue importance on those things or people, place it on Jesus, as He says, “Whoever comes to me will never hunger, and whoever believes in me will never thirst.” He is the One who fills our hearts. 

As you go about your day-to-day lives this week, try to recognize the times you are “working for food that perishes” by seeking things of the world to satisfy your heart. In those moments, recall that everything we have is a gift from God. Instead of misusing that gift, offer a prayer of thanksgiving for all He has given to you.© Catholic Stewardship Consultants, 2021.

Pastoral Pondering – Because I was not raised Catholic, the only liturgical expression at Mass that I knew was the revised Mass of Pope St. Paul VI which was later revised by Pope St. John Paul II. It was not until I began studying liturgy and Church history that I encountered the Mass of Pope St. Pius V which was promulgated following the Council of Trent. I certainly did not know how to offer the Mass but could follow some of those elements which had not been removed or revised by the reformers of the Second Vatican Council.

When in 2007 Pope Benedict issued his motu proprio, Summorum Pontificum in 2007, it was recognized as a continuation of some provisions for the older liturgy that Pope St. John Paul II had made a number of years earlier. Pope Benedict, as some indicated, “freed the old Mass.” Here in the Diocese, we offered training for those priests who were willing to learn it, and provided for its celebration in a number of places on the Diocese for those who were devoted to it. Although, my Latin is decent, I must admit that learning the extraordinary form, as Pope Benedict called it, was a challenge.

In my experience over the years, with some limited exceptions, I have found those who love this expression of the liturgy to be very sincere, devout and far from divisive. Nonetheless, I am aware of some who, for various reasons, expressed attitudes contrary to the teaching of the Church and certainly to the mind of Pope Benedict. Hence, while not unexpected in some form, when Pope Francis issued his motu proprio, Traditionis custodes, the rather sweeping nature of the Pope’s letter and the severity of its tone was not only surprising but disturbing.

One of the things that the Holy Father underscored was the responsibility of the local bishop to be the moderator of the liturgy in his own diocese. Each bishop then has the responsibility of interpreting the document in light of canonical practice and the ultimate goal of Church law, the salvation of souls. Thus far, there have been varying responses across the episcopal landscape, with the majority of bishops realizing the benefits that the extraordinary form has had for many over the years and discerning how best to implement the disciplinary laws laid out by Pope Francis. As with all of his official documents, this motu proprio has to be read in light of the overarching themes of this Pope’s papacy, specifically, accompaniment, mercy and synodality, which we might also call collegiality.

More importantly is how we, priests and people alike, respond. As brothers and sisters in Christ, our first response must be prayer. Prayer for the Holy Father and for the Bishops, that they be guided by the Holy Spirit in fulfilling their pastoral responsibility. Likewise, we should have genuine concern and compassion for those who feel aggrieved and strive to move forward serenely trusting that Bishop Jugis, in fulfilling his role of leading the flock and providing for the salus animarum might be the guiding force and the ultimate goal of all of our efforts.